Problem statements
Document current scoping bottlenecks and litigation risks so the AI program targets measurable gaps.
- Late discovery of missing baseline datasets
- Inconsistent Appendix G topic coverage
- Manual effort stitching project descriptions
Equip CEQA teams with language models that can draft project descriptions, interrogate baseline datasets, and flag the impact topics most likely to trigger focused analysis—without sacrificing defensibility.
Intermediate
4–6 week pilot
CEQA planner · Environmental analyst · NLP engineer
Structured project narratives, validated baseline data, prioritized impact screening
Move through discovery, model configuration, and operational rollout with reusable prompts, data validation routines, and stakeholder checklists built for CEQA timelines.
Define how AI-assisted scoping advances agency priorities, from faster screening letters to defensible issue identification. Align stakeholders on scope, success metrics, and required safeguards before touching prompts.
Document current scoping bottlenecks and litigation risks so the AI program targets measurable gaps.
Estimate time savings, quality gains, and risk reduction when LLMs draft narratives and scan inputs.
Establish model usage boundaries, human sign-offs, and documentation standards.
Impact scoping is only as strong as the inventories backing it. Stand up lightweight pipelines that catalog available data, score completeness, and route gaps for remediation.
Compile an extract describing datasets, formats, vintages, and custodians.
Integrate datasets into model-ready stores with clear access controls.
Automate detection and routing of missing baseline inputs into remediation workflows.
LLM generates gap tickets mapped to responsible data owners.
Assign retrieval actions, like commissioning surveys or sourcing GIS layers.
Require data stewardship sign-off before AI resumes scoping tasks.
Translate agency templates, Appendix G checklists, and jurisdictional thresholds into structured prompt components. Keep them version-controlled and reusable across project types.
Use chain-of-thought steps to gather inputs and produce consistent project description drafts.
Prompt the model to analyze data completeness and highlight missing supporting evidence.
Generate annotated matrices that align to Appendix G categories and local thresholds.
Integrate LLM outputs with project management systems, GIS viewers, and document templates so planners see AI assistance within their existing tools.
Convert applicant submittals into standardized project briefs with embedded data checks.
Pair LLM reasoning with rule-based thresholds to rank impact topics for SME focus.
Auto-assemble scoping memos and IS/MND outlines with traceable citations and reviewer tasks.
Pair AI efficiency with rigorous human review, documentation, and continuous monitoring to satisfy agency counsel and external reviewers.
Set up tiered QA to catch hallucinations, missing citations, and misclassified impacts.
Instrument usage analytics and escalate anomalies into remediation sprints.
Launch small, measure impact, and scale responsibly. The roadmap below structures work into digestible waves with clear exit criteria.
Assess data availability, select pilot project, formalize success metrics.
Configure prompts, integrate datasets, and run supervised scoping cycles.
Measure accuracy, cycle time, and planner satisfaction before scaling.
Roll production workflows across programs with continuous improvement loops.
Use this quick reference to keep scoping copilots accurate, transparent, and aligned with CEQA best practices.
Extend the playbook with these starting points and benchmarks.